By Minener Editorial Team | May 2025
President Trump’s April 2025 executive order to “fast-track” deep-sea mining has sparked outrage among scientists, environmentalists, and foreign governments. The White House frames it as a way to secure America’s supply of critical minerals — promising up to 100,000 jobs and “hundreds of billions” in GDP. But critics warn the order blatantly flouts international agreements, ignores the fragile marine environment, and risks a new resource “cold war” with China. As Greenpeace put it, the first application to mine the international seabed will be remembered as “an act of total disregard for international law and scientific consensus.”
International Law and a “Dangerous Precedent”
Under the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the world’s deep seabed beyond national waters is governed by the International Seabed Authority (ISA). The United States, however, never ratified UNCLOS, and thus holds no voting power in the ISA. Trump’s order declares the high seas open for American mining under outdated U.S. legislation — a stance that defies decades of global consensus.
China and European countries have condemned the move, warning it undermines the idea of oceans as a shared global commons. ISA officials caution that this unilateral move sets a dangerous precedent and could destabilize international cooperation on marine governance.
Fragile Abyss: Environmental Alarm Bells
The Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the Pacific Ocean, stretching between Hawaii and Mexico, is a prime target for mining. This seabed is rich in polymetallic nodules — and life. Up to 90% of species collected there are unknown to science. Deep-sea ecosystems grow slowly and are poorly understood. Scientists agree that industrial disruption could cause irreversible harm. Over 30 countries have called for a moratorium on mining until better protections and knowledge are in place.
Major companies like Google and BMW have pledged not to use metals mined from the seabed until the risks are fully understood. Yet the Trump administration’s order pushes ahead regardless, prompting widespread criticism from environmental groups and marine biologists alike.
A New Front in the U.S.–China Resource Race
The executive order is framed as a way to beat China in securing critical minerals. China already holds more ISA permits than any other country and is ramping up investment in deep-sea exploration. Trump’s move is viewed as a direct challenge — one that could lead to tit-for-tat actions and deepen maritime tensions.
Island nations in the Pacific, many of which border the CCZ, fear being caught between superpowers. Diplomats warn this policy could unravel global trust and push countries into unregulated exploitation of international waters.
International Reactions: A Global Chorus of Concern
Germany’s Environment Minister Steffi Lemke labeled the U.S. move a “breach of the global cooperation spirit,” reaffirming Berlin’s support for a global moratorium on deep-sea mining. France’s President Emmanuel Macron reiterated his commitment to protecting the world’s oceans, stating “no mining should begin without complete scientific certainty.”
Pacific Island nations such as Palau and Fiji condemned the U.S. move. Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jr. warned that “seabed mining threatens the livelihoods and identity of island nations.” Canada, home to The Metals Company, has called for further studies before any extraction begins. Norway has also adopted a precautionary tone, emphasizing environmental integrity over corporate expedience.
The European Union’s environmental commissioner described the executive order as “a dangerous disruption to international consensus,” while the African Group at the UN warned that it “jeopardizes the shared governance of our planet’s last frontier.”
Who Really Benefits? Follow the Companies
The Metals Company, a Canadian-Australian firm, is the most visible private actor in this push. It recently applied for a U.S. permit to mine the CCZ, bypassing ISA protocols. The firm — and others like it — stand to benefit immensely from Trump’s deregulation, despite the uncertainty around environmental consequences and long-term viability.
The economic justification is also thin. The U.S. lacks the processing infrastructure needed to refine these minerals at scale, and battery makers are already moving away from materials like cobalt and nickel. In short, the promised boom may be overstated.
Conclusion: A Risk Not Worth Taking
Trump’s executive order marks a radical shift in how the United States approaches the deep ocean — one that favors short-term commercial gain over long-term ecological health and international stability. The risks are immense: irreversible damage to marine life, legal chaos, and global diplomatic fallout.
Rather than leading the world toward sustainable ocean stewardship, the U.S. now risks alienating allies, undermining global norms, and torching fragile ecosystems for uncertain rewards. The ocean is not America’s to claim — and this latest “America First” maneuver could have planetary consequences.
For more updates on mining and energy policy, visit Minener.com.